Tutorspedia

Innovation At The Lego Group Case Study Help Analysis With Solution Online

Glancing for case solution online puts together each minute information in one place along with the assistance of highly certified and professional tutors who has the ability to scan your mind from its core and improve the quality of education. They prove themselves best in answering your questions ranging from the simplest one to the toughest. Keeping in mind the catching power and understanding ability of every student we provide the required solutions bit by bit by working relentlessly so that everyone can gain full knowledge without any difficulty. For preparing the students for extreme conditions we provide different worksheets and practice papers through which they can solve every question coming in their way. Considering the social and economic conditions of the students we charge you the most reasonable prices in comparison to other online services.
 
The case tells the story of a company where innovation is tremendously important, but not working well. In 2003, the LEGO Group had a number of positive attributes: it had a well-respected brand with some very good toy lines. It had a passionate customer base that in many areas was more sophisticated than its internal designers. And it had been able to extend the brand into many areas such as toys, games, clothing, theme parks, movies, and many others types of play, earning significant revenues (but not profits). But, in 2003, the company had gotten itself into deep trouble. Over the previous 5-10 years, the toy industry had been changing dramatically in ways that did not favor the LEGO Group. These changes, coupled with some poorly planned investments and a downturn in the sales of some important toy lines, combined to almost put the LEGO Group out of business. The company lost nearly DKK 1 billion in 2003 and its cash dwindled dangerously low. This was the largest loss in the history of the company, and many analysts believed that bankruptcy and perhaps even the breakup and sale of the company were likely. The company quickly sold off assets, reduced headcount, and outsourced production to cut costs and generate cash. But it knew, to turn around the company, it had to improve its overall innovation system. It had to improve the time to market, success rate, and profitability in its innovation system. The case presents a number of representative challenges that LEGO was facing during 2004 and beyond. Learning objectives: 1) How to restructure an innovation system. 2) How to encourage all types of innovation (innovation in pricing, business model, channel to market, branding, customer experience, etc.) and coordinate these innovations across the company. 3) How to involve external parties such as customers, complementary product producers, and external inventors in your innovation system.