Tutorspedia

Negotiating On Thin Ice: The 2004-2005 NHL Dispute Case Study Help Analysis With Solution Online

 
Glancing for case solution online puts together each minute information in one place along with the assistance of highly certified and professional tutors who has the ability to scan your mind from its core and improve the quality of education. They prove themselves best in answering your questions ranging from the simplest one to the toughest. Keeping in mind the catching power and understanding ability of every student we provide the required solutions bit by bit by working relentlessly so that everyone can gain full knowledge without any difficulty. For preparing the students for extreme conditions we provide different worksheets and practice papers through which they can solve every question coming in their way. Considering the social and economic conditions of the students we charge you the most reasonable prices in comparison to other online services.
 
On September 15, 2004, the existing collective bargaining agreement (CBA) between the National Hockey League (NHL) and the National Hockey League Players’ Association (NHLPA) expired. Because the two sides had failed to negotiate a new CBA by that date, NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman locked out the players–no hockey would be played, no revenues would be collected, and no salaries would be paid. The key issues in the negotiation were the league’s demand for a salary cap and for the linking of salaries to league revenues. The players opposed both of these demands. After months of near-fruitless negotiation, Bettman threatened to cancel the entire season, a move that would destroy billions in revenue. Provides a rich history of the two sides’ relationship and an account of the negotiations that led up to the season cancellation threat. Asks students to analyze the power tactics that each side has used to its advantage in prior negotiations and to propose strategies that might help either side pull off a successful negotiation in the current context, which involves entrenched positions, complex issues, and severe distrust.